neiconНаука и научная информацияScholarly Research and Information2658-3143NP «NEICON»10.24108/2658-3143-2021-4-1-2-29-58neicon-113Research ArticleНАУЧНАЯ ИЗДАТЕЛЬСКАЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТЬ И РАЗВИТИЕ ПРОФЕССИОНАЛЬНЫХ КОМПЕТЕНЦИЙACADEMIC PUBLISHING AND PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCYПрогноз развития российских журналов. Российские журналы открытого доступаForecast of the Development of Russian Scientific Journals: Open Access Journalshttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7555-8699МоскалеваО. В.MoskalevaO. V.

Ольга В. Москалева, канд. биол. наук, советник директора; член редколлегии журналов «Управление наукой: теория и практика», «Научная периодика. Проблемы и решения»

SPIN-код: 4518-0253

Университетская набережная, 7/9, г. Санкт-Петербург, 199034

Olga V. Moskaleva, Cand. Sci. (Biol.), Advisor of the Director; Editorial Board Member, “Science Management: Theory and Practice”, “Scientific Communications. Problems and Solutions”

Universitetskaya embankment, 7/9, Saint Petersburg, 199034

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2228-3932АкоевМ. А.AkoevM. A.

Марк А. Акоев, заведующий Лабораторией наукометрии; член ACM, ISSI, IEEE Computer Society и EuroCRIS

ул. Мира, 19, г. Екатеринбург, 620002

Mark A. Akoev, Head of the Scimetrics Lab, Member of the ACM, ISSI, IEEE Computer Society and EuroCRIS

Mira str., 19, Ekaterinburg, 620002

Научная библиотека им. М. Горького Санкт-Петербургского государственного университетаРоссияM. Gorky Scientific Library of the Saint Petersburg UniversityRussian FederationУральский федеральный университет им. первого Президента России Б. Н. ЕльцинаРоссияUral Federal University named after the first President of Russia B. N. YeltsinRussian Federation20212210202141-23362Copyright © Москалева О.В., Акоев М.А., 20212021Москалева О.В., Акоев М.А.Moskaleva O.V., Akoev M.A.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://05x01x01x01x02.ejs-01.elpub.dev/jour/article/view/113

Как наилучшим образом представить результаты научных исследований российских ученых? В контексте этого вопроса статья анализирует российские научные журналы открытого доступа. Авторами рассмотрены преимущества и проблемы поддержки публикаций открытого доступа с учетом интересов стейк-холдеров научных публикаций, представлены примеры государственной поддержки изданий открытого доступа и сформулированы варианты по адаптации модели открытого доступа в России. Проведен анализ информации об условиях открытого доступа для российских журналов. Исследована цитируемость журналов открытого доступа и традиционных подписных изданий с учетом типов открытого доступа и страны автора публикации. Представлены предложения по корректировке редакционной политики в целях продвижения российских журналов, повышения их качества и доступности. Сделаны итоговые выводы по всему множеству статей, посвященных прогнозу развития российских журналов.

The article analyzes Russian open access scholarly journals in the context of improving the presentation of the results of scientific research of Russian scientists. The advantages and problems of supporting open access publications are considered, taking into account the analysis of the interests of the stakeholders of scientific publications, examples of state policy for supporting open access publications are presented, and options for adapting the open access model in Russia are formulated. The analysis of the representation of information on the terms of open access for Russian journals is carried out. The citation rate of open access journals was investigated in comparison with the citation rate of traditional subscription publications taking into account the types of open access and the country of the author of the publication. Proposals for adjusting the editorial policy in order to promote Russian journals, improve their quality and accessibility are presented. The final conclusions are made for the entire series of articles devoted to the forecast of the development of Russian journals.

научные журналыоткрытый доступплан Sмодель возмещения расходоврегистрация журналовscholarly journalsopen accessPlan SAPCjournal registrationReferencesБерлинская Декларация об открытом доступе к научному и гуманитарному знанию Преамбула [Electronic resource]. 2003. URL: http://oa.mpg.de/lang/en-uk/berlin-prozess/berliner-erklarung/.Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities [Electronic resource]. 2003. URL: http://oa.mpg.de/lang/en-uk/berlin-prozess/berliner-erklarung/.Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing [Electronic resource]. 2003. URL: http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/bethesda.htm (accessed: 14.09.2021).Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing [Electronic resource]. 2003. URL: http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/bethesda.htm (accessed: 14.04.2020).Трищенко Н.Д. Открытый доступ к науке. Екатеринбург: Кабинетный ученый, 2017. 200 с.Trischenko N.D. Open Access to Science. Ekaterinburg: 2017. 200 p. (in Russ)Björk B.-C., Solomon D. Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact. BMC Medicine. 2012; (10): 73. DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-73.Björk B.-C., Solomon D. Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact. BMC Medicine. 2012; (10): 73 . doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-73.Ghane M.R., Niazmand M.R., Sabet Sarvestani A. The citation advantage for open access science journals with and without article processing charges. J. Inf. Sci. 2020; 46(1):118–130.Ghane M.R., Niazmand M.R., Sabet Sarvestani A. The citation advantage for open access science journals with and without article processing charges. J. Inf. Sci. 2020; 46(1):118–130.Heneberg P. The troubles of high-profile open access megajournals. Scientometrics. 2019; 120.:733–746.Heneberg P. The troubles of high-profile open access megajournals. Scientometrics. 2019; 120.:733–746.Buranyi S. Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science? [Electronic resource]. The Guardian. 2017. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-business-scientific-publishing-bad-for-science.Buranyi S. Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science? [Electronic resource]. The Guardian. 2017. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-business-scientific-publishing-bad-for-science.Kowaltowski A.J. et al. The push for open access is making science less inclusive [Electronic resource]. Times Higher Education. 2021. URL: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/opinion/push-open-access-making-science-less-inclusive (accessed: 31.08.2021).Kowaltowski A.J. et al. The push for open access is making science less inclusive [Electronic resource]. Times Higher Education. 2021. URL: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/opinion/push-open-access-making-science-less-inclusive (accessed: 31.08.2021).Латур Б. Наука в действии: Прагматический поворот. СПб.: Изд-во Европейского ун-та в СПб, 2013Latour B. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. — Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1988. — 288 p.Beall J. Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature. 2012;489(7415):179. DOI: 10.1038/489179a.Beall J. Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature. 2012;489(7415):179. DOI: 10.1038/489179aSyed I. India to develop own framework for open access instead of joining Plan S [Electronic resource]. Editage Insights. 2019. URL: https://www.editage.com/insights/india-develop-own-framework-open-access-instead-joining-plan-s.Syed I. India to develop own framework for open access instead of joining Plan S [Electronic resource]. Editage Insights. 2019. URL: https://www.editage.com/insights/india-develop-own-frame-work-open-access-instead-joining-plan-s.Björk B.-C. Why Is Access to the Scholarly Journal Literature So Expensive?. Libr. Acad. 2021;21(2):77–192.Björk B.-C. Why Is Access to the Scholarly Journal Literature So Expensive?. Libr. Acad. 2021;21(2):77–192.Brainard J. Open access takes flight. Science. 2021; 371(6524):16-20. DOI:10.1126/science.371.6524.16Brainard J. Open access takes flight. Science. 2021; 371(6524):16-20. DOI:10.1126/science.371.6524.16Eddy T.D. Plan S: Motivations of for-profit publishers. Science. 2019;363( 6426):. 462. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaw2107Eddy T.D. Plan S: Motivations of for-profit publishers. Science. 2019;363( 6426):. 462. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaw2107Brainard J. Facing Plan S, publishers may set papers free. Science. 2019; 364(6441):620. DOI: 10.1126/science.364.6441.620Brainard J. Facing Plan S, publishers may set papers free. Science. 2019; 364(6441):620. DOI: 10.1126/science.364.6441.620Rabesandratana T. Radical open-access plan is delayed a year: In response to criticisms, Plan S also lifts cap on article fees. Science. 2019;364,6444):919. DOI: 10.1126/science.364.6444.919Rabesandratana T. Radical open-access plan is delayed a year: In response to criticisms, Plan S also lifts cap on article fees. Science. 2019;364,6444):919. DOI: 10.1126/science.364.6444.919Schiltz M. Science Without Publication Paywalls: cOAlition S for the Realisation of Full and Immediate Open Access. Front. Neurosci. 2018;12:656. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00656Schiltz M. Science Without Publication Paywalls: cOAlition S for the Realisation of Full and Immediate Open Access. Front. Neurosci. 2018;12:656. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00656Kowaltowski A.J., Oliveira M.F. Plan S: Unrealistic capped fee structure. Science. 2019;363(6426):461. http://hdl.handle.net/10760/40949Kowaltowski A.J., Oliveira M.F. Plan S: Unrealistic capped fee structure. Science. 2019;363(6426):461. http://hdl.handle.net/10760/40949Spedding M. et al. Plan S: A threat to quality of science? Science. 2019:363( 6426):462. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaw1424Spedding M. et al. Plan S: A threat to quality of science? Science. 2019:363( 6426):462. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaw1424Brainard J. Publishing: Scientific societies worry about threat from Plan S. Scienc.. 2019;363(6425): 332–333. DOI: 10.1126/science.363.6425.332Brainard J. Publishing: Scientific societies worry about threat from Plan S. Scienc.. 2019;363(6425): 332–333. DOI: 10.1126/science.363.6425.332Else H. Ambitious open-access Plan S delayed to let research community adapt [Electronic resource] Nature. 2019. May 30. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-019-01717-2.Else H. Ambitious open-access Plan S delayed to let research community adapt [Electronic resource] Nature. 2019. May 30. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-019-01717-2.Домнина Т.Н. Российские научные издания в Справочнике журналов открытого доступа. НТИ CEP. 1. Орг. и методика информ. работы. 2018; 26–39.Domnina T. N. Russian Scholarly periodicles in directory of open access journaks. NTI, Ser.1 2018; 26–39.(in Russ)Москалева О.В., Акоев М.А. Прогноз развития российских научных журналов: индексация в международных указателях цитирования (платформа Web of Science). Наука и научная информация. 2020; 3(1):30–63. DOI: 10.24108/2658-3143-2020-3-1-30-63Moskaleva O.V., Akoev M.A. Forecast of the development of Russian scientific journals: indexing in international citation indexes (Web of Science platform). Scholarly Research and Information. 2020;3(1):30-63. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.24108/2658-3143-2020-3-1-30-63Акоев М.А., Москалева О.В. Прогноз развития российских научных журналов: индексация в международных указателях цитирования (Scopus). Наука и научная информация. 2020;3(1):64–84.Akoev M.A., Moskaleva O.V. Forecast of the development of Russian scientific journals: indexing in international citation indexes (Scopus). Scholarly Research and Information. 2020;3(1):64-84. (In Russ.)

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.